I suppose it says something about your status in life if you are pleased or appalled to see Wall Street titans with eight-figure incomes taken away in handcuffs and booked. It's a bit like the lawyers in Qualcomm v Broadcom: we can identify with them until the lying starts, and then we no longer see ourselves in their moccasins.
This time it's two Bear Stearns brokers who ran a subprime hedge fund. Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin did the perp walk in Brooklyn early yesterday morning. In a New York Times article this morning, the case against them is described as built upon e-mail exchanges where they confide grave misgivings about the integrity of their fund while making rosy projections to their clients. Enron's Ken Lay lives on in the minds and hearts at Broad and Wall.
What caught my attention were the misgivings expressed in the article about the ability to secure convictions based on e-mail (pointing to the Frank Quattrone debacle).
Is e-mail evidence really less persuasive to juries?
The second tidbit that put matters in perspective for me mens rea-wise was this one:
A few days later, Mr. Tannin, who was known within the group as a worrier, sent an e-mail message to Mr. Cioffi in which he suggested closing down the funds after a report showed that the securities they were holding were rapidly losing value. “If the report was true, the entire subprime market was toast,” he wrote to Mr. Cioffi. The subprime market looked “pretty dam ugly,” he wrote from his home, early Sunday morning.
It was a radical proposition from one of the funds’ managers, and Mr. Tannin took the precaution of not using Bear’s e-mail system, prosecutors said. He sent the note to the e-mail account of Mr. Cioffi’s wife.
Recent Comments